Harper Has Forked Tongue
It's all about ACTIONS, not WORDS
Jason wants it both ways, which explains why he speaks from both sides of his mouth.
* He refused to give our legislators a Yes/No answer about the rail.
* He voted to deny taxpayers a vote on it.
* He is determined to appease his supporters at the Chamber and Growth Council.
Yet he calls for self-supporting transit when talking to the new regional Transit Planning Board.
It is fur shure -- Jason does not get it. We know he is a RINO and floats on the wind. He cannot be trusted to ACT on our behalf.
Read Jason Pye's assessment of Harper at "They Actually Admit It"
[Harper] admits to what Steve Davis, John Douglas, Larry Stanley, BJ Mathis and I have been saying for the last year.
http://www.jasonpye.com/blog/2006/02/they_actually_admit_it.html#trackback
2 Comments:
Did you see Jason's so-called response to this editorial in the Herald? He didnot refute any ofthe charges. In fact he "supported" Kay Pippin's email barrage to her most influential contacts.
And he lied. Henry County IS in line to pay costs of the rail. Hampton stop is Phase II of the program!
Jason says to contact our legislators. OK, then
1. Why has he not given them a straight answer on his position?
2. Why did Rep. Lunsford introduce HB1033 in the first place?
3. Why did Rep. Davis labor to get information, study and refute it, then take abuse from the Chamber?
4. Why is Den. Douglas poised to introduce a Senate version of HB1033?
Ooh, I love to do a little side step. Now you see me, now you don't. I'm here and gone. THIS is the best Jason can do. His answer floats - like the other material we all know about
Posted by: BillyBob | February 24, 2006 02:25 PM
Jason's feeble-minded blather was in today's Herald (Friday). But it is not posted online.
Just like Stanley's editorial is not online.
I hope you buy a Herald (at least once) to see how Jason two-stepped around Kay (saying "she never appeared in the Herald opposing the rail") without denying her email blitz!! His whole editorial confirmed what Stanley's editorial said!!
Posted by: HCMOM | February 24, 2006 04:25 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home